Two-front advance in the cards
Native American tribes could soon advance their US gambling operations on both online and retail fronts under proposed rule changes by the federal government.
The Wall Street Journal on Sunday provided the details of a proposal submitted last week by the Bureau of Indian Affairs. The federal agency is proposing new rules allowing tribes to negotiate statewide online betting deals under tribal-state compacts.
remote wagers taken through servers on tribal lands would count as on-reservation betting
According to the proposal, remote wagers taken through servers on tribal lands would count as on-reservation betting, an issue that had previously proven a sticking point for tribal compacts to expand betting options.
The Bureau of Indian Affairs has additionally proposed to relax the rules around allowing tribes to purchase additional land that state and federal bodies could eventually approve for casino development.
Paving the way
“Internet gaming is rapidly becoming the largest expansion of gaming in modern history and is quickly developing into a reality where tribes are on the outside looking in,” said Bo Mazzetti, chairman of the Rincon Band of Luiseño Indians in California, in a letter supporting the changes.
The additional proposal by the federal agency would make it easier for tribes to acquire land, a process in which tribes request the US government move properties on their behalf into a trust. For off-reservation land, the Interior Department would examine how land purchase would benefit a given tribe, with distance to the reservation not a priority.
Lost tax revenue fears
According to the WSJ, the proposals have come under fire from commercial gambling operators and state and local government leaders. Both parties are concerned about losing tax revenues and having less influence over the location of new casinos.
20 Republican state attorneys-general sent a letter listing multiple concerns around the proposals. An excerpt of the letter from Montana Attorney General Austin Knudsen claims the proposals would:
authorize an unprecedented expansion of tribal casino gaming.”
Knudsen added the expansion would unjustifiably restrict “the ability of state governments to adopt and enforce their own policies on gaming matters.” Some believe that the the amendments would require states to permit forms of gambling that some state laws might not have otherwise allowed, such as sports betting or iGaming in states that haven’t legalized it.